The manner of direction is as futile as it is flawless. Failing to feel freedoms forthright face is
not something to neither forsake nor forget, but rather, a fearful and fatal
fight. You’re either a foolish freak or
a fretting friar to forsake and forget such a fate and fight as freedom’s
forthright face. It has become a
furnished fortune, not a fear filled fabricated force. Take down the fake flag and fierce façade you
uphold as your final frontier, for anarchists fails to foresee the fallacies of
the fallen future fetus, lacking faith’s fire and the female’s fortitude. Foolish is the man without frugality,
flexibility, and feeling. Their fate
holds only frailty and fallacy which eventually leads to a freedom less
fatality. While the felon fornicates his
life away, we will stand as a firm force on the foundation of our fortified
Father. As the feather falls from the
fierce falcon, we will fill our faith with fire and fortitude. We will find the fresh face of a freedom’s
fight. Our feet will feel the forest
floor knowing of the fortune of the foolish, feeling less man. Our stomachs will be filled with the food of
the fat and free for we did not forsake nor forget freedom’s forthright face.
-Mikey D. B.-
Utopia. Often when we hear this word, definitions
like perfection, peace, or an ideal society come to mind. Despite what you may have heard about what
Utopia means or even the origins of this word, it was in fact invented by Sir
Thomas More in 1515 when he wrote the book Utopia. The direct translation comes from Greek
roots. The ‘U’ in Utopia, is a root for
‘not’ or ‘no’, and the ‘topia’ means
‘place’. So Utopia literally means “No
Place”. It doesn’t mean ‘perfect’ or
‘ideal’, but rather ‘not in existence’. Funny
how a word associated with the perfect society actually means that is doesn’t
exist, and is a fictional idea. Now
don’t get me wrong, there are reasons why these false definitions are around
and frankly they can be argued and probably upheld.
In Sir
Thomas More’s book Utopia, his
character Raphael Hythloday describes of his journey to a perfect society; it’s
a place of ideal perfection in law, government, and social conditions. In this land, the people experience peace
everyday through social compliance and strict control of desires and
pleasure. Slavery exists in Utopia, but
this is like their version of prison, but murder, theft, adultery, and hunger
are virtually unknown to the citizens of Utopia and Raphael describes how a
people are even capable of creating such a place. In a nutshell, all of this is made possible
not by the people of this land, but by a government eliminating not only
private property but privacy in general.
Everyone dresses the same, classes do not exist, their passions and
pleasures are constantly monitored.
These citizens are encouraged to pursue education, but not too much;
they master limited professions (The
Norton Anthology, Volume 1 pp: 518-590).
Utopia is not just a place not in existence, but as Thomas More
describes it through his book, it is a place without human desire and drive.
Freedom is a sensitive word and
there are many different view points on what people think true freedom
entails. It is a perspective. There are at least two extreme ends of the spectrum
and possibly more (Capitalism and Socialism being some of them), but the
obvious ones in my mind are: one, the anarchists who rule by chaos and not
order and two, the Utopian nuts creating robots out of everyone, eliminating
the opportunity to act on their own thoughts.
In a sense, I agree with both view points because I believe there is a
moderation in all things. When we find a
balance between extremes, that is when we are truly free.
Utopia has no antagonism, but at
what price? What is the price to live in
a land without murder, rape, and robbery on a world as corrupt as ours? Jack Rackove, a political science professor
at Stanford University, describes what absolute peace costs when he said how
when we want to avoid political drama and conflict, all we have to do is make
everyone do whatever the ruler does (Jack
Rackove, Stanford Colonial and Revolutionary Podcast #11). We all know how well that works out. History, along with dozens of stories like The Hunger Games and V for Vendetta tell how miserable it is to
blindly comply with a tyrant and that there will always be someone who will
fight against that way of thinking, and honestly, I agree with those
rebels. There is a difference between
forcing a people to comply by rules because you find them incompetent of
judging righteously, and having a righteous people think, judge, and determine
what is best by what rules they are given and do so uniformly.
Freedom is not peaceful. We deserve the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness but we must fight for it. Freedom must be earned. There is a sense of responsibility that comes with being free. When I bought my first car I felt a morsel of that real freedom. I thought, “I could drive toCalifornia
right here and right now if I wanted to”, but at the same time I knew if I did,
there were certain conditions I would need to follow. I would have to drive responsibly. I would have to at least plan some things out
like food and gas stops. I had to work
to actually buy the car and would have to continue to do so to provide the
funds needed to drive the distance. I
was at the liberty to go where I wanted, but it would come at a price. Nothing is free. Freedom is not free. I won’t go into to much detail here, but
Capitalism is based on risk taking. You
spend money to make money. You invest in
ideas and processes that may or may not yield a return, but in the end, you
reap what you sew. So it is with
freedom. Free to think and to feel how
you want, but paying with consequential currency, good or bad.
Freedom is not peaceful. We deserve the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness but we must fight for it. Freedom must be earned. There is a sense of responsibility that comes with being free. When I bought my first car I felt a morsel of that real freedom. I thought, “I could drive to
All in all,
when the Founding Fathers drafted and signed the Declaration of Independence,
they did so under the belief that “all men are created equal” and all have the
unalienable rights, incapable of being surrendered, these being “life, liberty,
and the pursuit of happiness.” Now,
let’s not get into the debate of what “all men” meant then in 1776, because we
all know that Thomas Jefferson had dozens, if not hundreds of slaves when he
wrote those words, making this one of the great ironies of history. We cannot judge these imperfect men with our
egalitarian understanding. However, we
know now that the freedom they felt was a pure one and one that has
unfortunately been tainted, twisted, and then rationalized as unattainable by
logical fallacies and intellects of every kind.
But in the end, so does anything that is good and pure. The werd ‘independence’ in that declaration
was declaring to King George III that this nation would be an independent one;
it would be a nation free, not needing to be dependent on anyone else. I
believe that that is the true freedom they were seeking and it is what I seek
now, being able to provide and protect me and my household, not being dependent
on tangible or government assistance and a socialized agenda. Freedom cannot be given, it must be earned.